Isochron radiometric dating new thread

Where are the data and age calculations that result in a consistent set of ages for all rocks on earth, as well as those from the moon and the meteorites, no greater than 10 000 years? Second, it is an approach doomed to failure at the outset.Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical.First, it provides no evidence whatsoever to support their claim that the earth is very young.

Different methods of radiometric dating vary in the timescale over which they are accurate and the materials to which they can be applied.

Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.

In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze (for example, Woodmorappe 1979; Morris HM 1985; Morris JD 1994).

Among the best-known techniques are radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon dating and uranium-lead dating.

By allowing the establishment of geological timescales, it provides a significant source of information about the ages of fossils and the deduced rates of evolutionary change.

Search for isochron radiometric dating new thread:

isochron radiometric dating new thread-70isochron radiometric dating new thread-65isochron radiometric dating new thread-80

Only rarely does a creationist actually find an incorrect radiometric result (Austin 1996; Rugg and Austin 1998) that has not already been revealed and discussed in the scientific literature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “isochron radiometric dating new thread”